RASUPALLE VEERA SUDARSAN REDDY v. PULLAGURA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
CRP/1377/2021 · 2025-06-23
T C D Sekhar
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32334 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32334 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
4 \yy/ APHC010476122021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI BSS TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1377 OF 2021 Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Docket Order dated 21-10-2021 O.S.No.30 of 2021on the file of the Court of the IV , FAC-1 Additional District Judge at Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. Between: aggrieved by passed in I.A.No.433 of 2021 in Additional District Judge, Rasupalle Veera Sudarsan Reddy, S/o.Late R.Chinna Hindu, aged about 46 Apartments, NGO Colony, Kadapa City and District. Veera Reddy, R/o.Flat No.402, Sri Lakshmi Elite years ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff AND
1. Pullagura Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o.Late P.Subramanyam, aged about 47 years, R/o.D.No.2/78-6, Maruthi Nagar, Kadapa City and District.
2. Puiiagura Sai Naimisha, D/o.Late P.Subramanyam years, R/o.D.No.2/78-6, Maruthi Nagar, Kadapa City and
3. Puiiagura Sai Hasitha, D/o.Late P.Subramanyam,, R/o.D.No.2/78-6, Maruthi Nagar, Kadapa City and District. ...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants aged about 24 District. aged about 22 years.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following:
APHC010476122021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] Hif** TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1377/2021 Between: Rasupalle Veera Sudarsan Reddy ...PETITIONER AND Pullagura Vijaya Lakshmi and others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) TSAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.
f % The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the present Civil Revision Petition does not survive.
2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The I Additional District Judge at Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. One CC to Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies
2.
3. BSV nm
HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER CRP No.1377 OF 2021 0 8 SEP 2025 O i ) O ^VsQ^tfrent Sectiop>%^^ DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS