Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32332 (RAJ)

SAHIN KHATUN DAUGHTER OF SHRI MUHAMMAD SHAPHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18085/2023 · 2025-03-26

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13716] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2549/2024 Rahul Kumar S/o Satpal Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Gumjal, Post Gumjal, District Fazilka, Punjab. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Personnel And Training Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 4. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18085/2023 Sahin Khatun Daughter Of Shri Muhammad Shaphi, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of House No. 685, Patel Nagar, Orai, District Jalaun, Madhya Pradesh. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Gramin Vikas And Panchayatiraj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18086/2023 Sudeep Sisodiya Son Of Shri Manoj Sisodiya, Aged About 30 [2025:RJ-JP:13716] (2 of 3) [CW-2549/2024] Years, Resident Of House No. 70, Ward No. 03, Village Bhaiwakhedi, Post Chidawad, Tonk Khurd, Dewas, District Dewas, Madhya Pradesh. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Gramin Vikas And Panchayatiraj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18141/2023 1. Salman Khan Son Of Shri Sami Hasan, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, At Present Resident Of Plot No. 25, Shyam Nagar, Road No. 08, Sikar Road, Near Mahila Thana, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Dhruv Meena Son Of Shri Ram Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Village Sunwai, Post Vijaypur, Tehsil Vijaypur, District Sheopur, Madhya Pradesh 3. Anshul Khandelwal Son Of Shri Mohan Lal, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 08, Ramsingh Ki Gali, Baroda, District Sheopur Madhya Pradesh. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Gramin Vikas And Panchayatiraj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, Adv. Mr. Aamir Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arpit Jain with Mr. Manish Bharadwaj for Mr. Nalin S. Narain Mr. Saumil Sharma for [2025:RJ-JP:13716] (3 of 3) [CW-2549/2024] Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma Mr. Narendra Singh Chaudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 26/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the present matter pertains to appointment on the post of Teacher Gr. III (Level-I, Level-II). Learned counsel has relied upon the judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16676/2022 titled as Manish Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and has submitted that the said judgment was assailed before the Division Bench however the ratio of the same was maintained vide order dated 09.02.2024 passed in D.B. Special Appl. Writ No.453/2023. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have consented to the fact that the ratio applied in above judgment is akin to the present controversy. Therefore, the lis in question is no more res-integra. 3. In light of the same, the present petitions are allowed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 4. A copy of this order be placed in each file. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /282-285