Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32331 (CHH)

Pritam Sonkar v. State of Chhattisgarh

WPC/4224/2021 · 2025-04-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4224 of 2021 1. Pritam Sonkar S/o Kartik Ram, Aged About 54 Years R/o Amatalab Road, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 2. Ashok Kumar Patel, S/o Suraj Lal Patel, R/o Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 3. Tulsi Ram Sonkar, S/o Late Shri Jhadu Ram Sonkar, Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 4. Ramesh Chungani, S/o Late Shri Khan Chand Chungani, R/o Tikra Para Ward No. 21, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Zila Krishi Upaj Mandi Board, Dhamtari, Through Its Secretary Zila Krishi Upaj Mandi Krishi Upaj Mandi Road, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 3. Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Yashkaran Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07. 04.2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 2 would submit that the petitioner has challenged auction of 29 shops and those shops have alredy been allowed to beneficiaries, and thus, this petition has become infructutous. 2 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Singh, the instant petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to challenge the order of allotment, if so advised. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant