Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32329 (PNJ)

NAVEEN KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/13076/2025 · 2025-03-21

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13076-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 21.03.2025 NAVEEN KUMAR ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Rajiv Verma, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Rishma Verma, Advocate for respondents No. 7 to 9. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for issuance of directions to respondent no.2 and 3 to ensure free, fair and impartial investigation in FIR no. 79 dated 31.07.2024 (Annexure P1) registered under section 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3),103(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (section 109 and 238 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha added lateron) PS Jodhewal, District Ludhiana as the petitioner/complainant/victim had filed petition bearing CRWP no.8601 of 2024, in which, notice of motion was issued and reply was filed by the state i.e. affidavit of respondent no.3 was filed stating therein that section 109 of BNS has been added but after dismissal of bail application of the accused vide order dated 05.02.2025 (Annexure P-9). Anuradha 2025.03.25 06:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13076-2025 -2- Today reply dated 21.03.2025 by way of affidavit of Kuldeep Singh Chahal, IPS, Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana has been filed on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 5, the same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been furnished to the counsel opposite. The relevant paragraph No.4 (xiii, xiv) and 5 have been reproduced below :- (xiii) The inquiry was conducted by ADCP-3, Ludhiana, Respondent No.4 and on the basis of opinion of Medical Board in respect of injuries sustained by the complainant Naveen Kumar which were declared as Simple in nature, recommendation was made by him for deletion of offence under section 109 B.N.S without considering the intention of the accused and the fact that injuries No. 1 and 2 were inflicted on the complainant's head, which is a vital part of the body and has further failed to appreciate the statement of the victim and correlate the same with the injuries on the vital part of the body i.e. head. xiv) Since the respondent No.4 has not considered the affidavit furnished by the deponent before this Hon'ble Court during inquiry nor any discussion regarding the facts of the case was made with deponent. Moreover, he failed to appreciate the statement of the victim and correlate the same with the injuries on the vital part of the body i.e. head. Hence, by doing so, the respondent No.4 has rendered proof regarding dereliction, negligence and irregularity in discharge of his official duty. Accordingly, show-cause notice dated 07.03.2025 has been issued by the deponent to respondent No.4 to submit his explanation. Further, the additional charge of ADCP-3 has been taken back from Sh. Ramandeep Singh Bhullar, PPS.’ 5. That the deponent has taken the matter very seriously and now vide GD No. 26 dated 07.03.2025,offence under Section 109 of BNS, 2023 has been added. Anuradha 2025.03.25 06:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13076-2025 -3- True translation of GD No. 26 is attached as Annexure R-3 whereas true copy of the same is appended as (Annexure R-3).’ In pursuance to the last order dated 07.03.2025, the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana is present in Court and accept the deposition made in the affidavit, submits that ADCP, Ludhiana conducted the enquiry and show cause notice dated 07.03.2025 has been issued to respondent No.4 and additional charge of ADCP has been taken back from the erring official. In view of the above, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition any further since the offence under Section 109 BNS has been added and the accused Piyush Verma, Ankit Verma have been arrested and now are in jail. Prayer is accepted. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 21.03.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.03.25 06:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document