( 2025:JHHC:37886 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7182 of 2025 1.Ajay Kumar Sharma, aged about 29 years, son of Rajendra Sharma, resident of village-Charki Pahari, P.O. and P.S. Jainagar, District-Koderma 2. Rajesh Kumar, aged about 34 years, son of Dhaneshwar Yadav, resident of village Charki Pahari, P.O. and P.S. Jainagar, District-Koderma 3. Shashikant Kumar Dehati, aged about 31 years, son of Ramprasad Yadav, resident of village Chamgudokhurd, P.O. and P.S. Jainagar, District-Koderma ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha, Advocate Ms. Kumari Priyambada, Advocate Mr. Anshuman Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. 04/ 17.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 303(2), 324(2), 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land of the petitioners was acquired and compensation was not made and in view of that petitioners was agitating for that false case has been registered against the petitioners on the instigation of MLA, Barhi. He further submits that there are another three cases being Jainagar P.S. Case No. 119/2025, 120/2025 and 123/2025. He then submits that in another case the petitioner no.1 has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 7076 of 2025. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. He then submits that it is not believable that petitioners will do same act continuously for that four cases have been lodged against the petitioners. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of ( 2025:JHHC:37886 ) anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of extortion and assault are there. 5. In para 21 of the petition it has been disclosed for the same type of allegation another three cases have been lodged being Jainagar P.S. Case No. 119/2025, 120/2025 and 123/2025 on the instigation of MLA, Barhi and it has been pointed out that land of the petitioners was acquired and compensation was not made for that petitioner was agitating and in another case the petitioner no.1 has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 7076 of 2025 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Koderma, in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.17.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-