Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32326 (HP)

BHASKRA NAND v. State of HP

CRMPM/1665/2025 · 2025-07-17

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Bhaskra Nand Vs. State of HP Cr. MP(M) No. 1665 of 2025 17.07.2025 Present: Ms. Tejasvi Verma, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent/State. The present application has been filed for condonation of 93 days’ delay in filing the appeal. No reply is to be filed to the application. Heard. The averments made in the application show that the applicant was unable to engage a counsel and Legal Aid Counsel was assigned to him. The learned Legal Aid Counsel applied for the copy of the judgment passed by learned Trial Court, which took considerable time to procure it. Considering the fact that the delay occurred due to the assignment of the Legal Aid and these circumstances were beyond the control of a person. Therefore, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal(ST) No.6391 of 2025 Vide separate order passed in Cr.MP(M) No. 1625 of 2025, the delay in filing the appeal has been condoned. Appeal be registered. Notice. Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Records be called for. Cr.MP(ST) No. 6392 of 2025 Application be registered. Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks and list alongwith main matter. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 17th July, 2025 (Ritu)