Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2208 WP No. 24336 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 24336 OF 2021 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
SHRI CHAITRA PRIYA S/O SAVALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, BBMP, NO 122, 4TH CROSS, 10TH BLOCK, 2ND STAGE, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU-560 072.
KARNATAKA STATE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.BASAVARAJAPPA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
KARNATAKA STATE.
2.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001.
KARNATAKA STATE.
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560 001.
KARNATAKA STATE.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2208 WP No. 24336 of 2021
4.
THE SENIOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE,, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR ZONE, BENGALURU-560 091.
KARNATAKA STATE.
5.
THE SENIOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, DASARAHALLI ZONE, BENGALURU-560 073.
KARNATAKA STATE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1;
SMT. ANJANA., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. RAKSHITHA.D.J., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO 5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.D.Basavarajappa., counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondent No.1 and Smt.Anjana., counsel on behalf of Smt.Rakshitha.D.J., for respondents 2 to 5 have appeared in person.
2. Counsel for respondents 2 to 5 on instruction submits that pursuant to the invitation of tenders, the process
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2208 WP No. 24336 of 2021
is completed as of today. Hence, an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for respondents 2 to 5 is placed on record.
3. Because of the completion of the process of tenders, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed.
4. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 9