Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32309 (JHR)

MAHENDRA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/636/2025 · 2025-12-05

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36556 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.636 of 2025 ------ Mahendra Yadav, S/o Late Aajabi Yadav, R/o Village Kanadih, P.O., P.S. & District Godda, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sri Zeeshan Qamer, the Deputy Commissioner, Godda, P.O., P.S. & District Godda, Jharkhand. 3. Manoj Kumar Pandey, the Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, Ranchi, Project Implementation Unit, Ranchi, at B-402, Road No.4C, Ashok Nagar, Ranchi, P.O. & P.S. Argora, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the O.P. (s) : Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocate Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC Mines-III ----- 03/ 05.12.2025 Vide order dated 31.01.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.4878 of 2023, this Court directed to ensure payment of the adequate compensation as per law, after preparation of the Award, which was to be considered by the opposite parties. Learned counsel representing the opposite parties submits that they have taken the decision rejecting the claim of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact, no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the opposite parties, it is open to him to challenge the same before the appropriate Forum. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 05th December, 2025 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 06.12.2025