1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 722 of 2025 The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Through Its Divisionl Manager, Divisional Office, 1st Floor, Rama Trade Centre, Near Bus Stand, Civil And Revenue District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin- 495001 ... Applicant/Petitioner versus 1 - Kumud Paikra Wd/o Late Yashwant Paikra Aged About 23 Years 2 - Kishan Minor S/o Late Yashwant Paikra Aged About 3 Years, Minor Through Mother And Natural Guardian Respondent No.1 Smt. Kumud Paikra, Wd/o Late Yashwant Paikra, Aged About 23 Years, 3 - Kunti Wd/o Roopdhar Aged About 63 Years All are By Caste- Kanwar, R/o. Village- Bangaon, Police Station And Tahsil- Farsabahar, District- Jashpur (C.G.) Claimants 4 - Sanjay Jha (Dead) Through Lrs. 4.(I) Smt. Runa Jha Wd/o Late Shri Sanjay Jha Aged About 40 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Kharsia, Police Station- Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4.(II) Smt. Sushma Mishra D/o Late Shri Sanjay Jha Aged About 30 Years W/o Prabhat Shankar Mishra, R/o Ward No. 12, Near Trilokinath Mandir, Rajkumarganj, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga, Bihar Pin-846004 4.(III) Akash S/o Late Sanjay Jha Aged About 23 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Kharsia, Police Station- Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4.(IV) Suraj S/o Late Sanjay Jha Aged About 21 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Kharsia, Police Station- Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 4.(V) Smt. Indrakala Devi Wd/o Late Shri Phool Jha Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Madanpur, Kharsia, Police Station- Kharsia, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Rajesh Kumar Goenka S/o Vishwanath Goenka Aged About 41 Years Caste Maheshwari, R/o Village Janki Dharmshala, Kharsiya, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Owner ... Respondents Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.07.22 10:17:06 +0530 2 For Applicants/Petitioners : Shri Akash Shrivastava appears on behalf of Shri R.N.Pusty, Advocate. For Respondent No.5 : Shri Adil Minhaj, Advocate. {HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 21/07/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C. for restoration of MAC No.562 of 2015 dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 17.06.2025. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, which duly supported by the affidavit, I am inclined to allow the M.C.C. 3. Accordingly, M.C.C. is allowed and the MAC No.562/2015 is restored to its original file. A copy of this order be kept on the record of MAC No.562/2015. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani