Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010476612018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22445/2018 Between:
1. SIMHADRI JHANSI LAKSHMI, W/O.VENKATA SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.16-7, KONDAPALLI VILLAGE, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM
3. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDURU POLICE STATION GUDURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
4. BURAGADDA YESUBABU, S/O.LATE JAGANNADHA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. BURAGADDA SARASWATHI, W/O. YESUBABU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
6. BURAGADDA NAGA VENKATA SRINIVAS KUMAR, S/O.
YESUBABU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
7. BURAGADDA ARUNA KUMAR, S/O.YESUBABU, AGED ABOUT 25
2
YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
8. BURAGADDA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O.LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O..KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
9. BURAGADDA VARALAKSHMI, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
10. BURAGADDA UDAYA BHANU, S/O.RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
11. BURAGADDA RAVI TEJ, S/O.RAMA KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
12. VEMANA SAIBABU, S/O.NOT KNWON, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
13. PANCHAKARLA VEERA BABU, S/O.NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
14. PANCHAKARLA NAGA MANI, W/O.VEERA BABU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GLIDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
15.
PANCHAKARLA SURESH, S/O.VEERA BABU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. KANKATAVA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not completing the investigation and filing final report/charge sheet in Cr.No. 104/2018 of Guduru Police Station, Guduru, Krishna District dt 22.05.2018 as illegal, arbitrary etc., and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2018
3
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the English translated copies of annexures I and II in the above writ petition for the present IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action in Cr.No.104/2018 of Guduru Police station, guduru Krishna District dt. 22.05.2018 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V V L N SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
4
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ,
order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in not completing the investigation and filing final report/charge sheet in Cr.No.104/2018 of Guduru Police Station, Guduru, Krishna District, dt.22.05.2018 as illegal, arbitrary etc.,…”
2. Heard Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance.
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.07.2025 JLV
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.22445 of 2018
Dated.24.07.2025
JLV
107