HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25392 of 2023 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State; learned counsel for the first informant and perused the material placed on record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Sher Singh @ Sheru Verma with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 363 of 2022, under Sections 342, 377, 363 IPC and Section 5M/6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station Chirgaon, District- Jhansi, during pendency of trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case due to village party bandi. He is languishing in jail since 05.12.2022 and some prosecution have also been examined before the trial court. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the first informant have vehemently opposed the above arguments and submitted that the applicant has committed a very heinous offence. They have drawn the attention of the Court towards the statement of injured/ victim, wherein he has stated that applicant has committed unnatural sex with him due to which sustained injury on his private part. PW 4, Doctor Abhishek Sahu has also examined before the trial court and he has stated that the anus was torn at 07 o'clock and 11 o'clock and healing process was started. Thus, the injury report/ medical evidence corroborates with the statement of the injured/victim, who was aged about 5 years only at the time of incident, whereas the age of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhisht Jaiswal, Ashish Kumar, Atharva Dixit, Dileep Kumar, Prashant Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shailendra Singh Sher Singh @ Sheru Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) applicant was about 32 years. At the time of examination before the trial court on 15.11.2024, the victim has stated that he was aged about eight years and a student of Class- 3 and also reiterated the version as stated above. 5. Thus, taking into account the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and the evidence on record and the complicity of the applicant in offence in question, age of the victim, the statement of the victim and seriousness of the offence, this Court do not find any ground to release the applicant on bail. 6. The bail application stands rejected. 7. The trial Court is directed to proceed the trial according to rules and procedure on priority basis and to conclude the trial expeditiously, from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment, if there is no legal impediment. (Santosh Rai,J.) September 19, 2025 Radhika BAIL No. 25392 of 2023 2 Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad