CHHATTISGARH METAL AND ENGINEERING WORKS UNION, BHILAI, DISTRICT DURG, CHHATTISGARH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPL/98/2022 · 2025-03-20
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32301 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32301 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:13469
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 98 of 2022 • Chhattisgarh Metal And Engineering Works Union, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh Through Its General Secretary, Arvind Shrivastava Son Of Late Dayanand Lal Shrivastava, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 09, Kailash Nagar, Housing Board Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Labour Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Labour Commissioner Office Of Labour Commissioner, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Collector Durg District - Durg, Chhattisgarh
4. Sub Divisional Officer Durg, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh
5. Assistant Director Industrial, Health And Security And Factory Inspector, Chhattisgarh Government Durg Division, Durg District - Durg, Chhattisgarh
6. M/s. Simplex Costing Limited Through Its Managing Director, Office At Bhilai, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocte For Respondents No. 1, 3, 4 and 5 For Respondent No. 6 : : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ajay Singh Pal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 20/03/2025
1. At the very outset, Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that as the State Government Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 (Labour Department) has moved an application under Section 15 (3) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 before the appropriate authority, therefore, the petitioner does not want to continue this petition.
2. No objection from other side.
3. Considering the submission made by Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, the petition is disposed of as the application has already been moved by the State on behalf of the petitioner. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti