1 2025:CGHC:31852 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3526 of 2025 1 - Umadevi Agrawal W/o Gajendra Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Subhash Chowk Raigarh Tahsil District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Capital Complex New Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector District Raigarh Collectorate Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Cum Land Acquistion Officer Tahsil And District - Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer Kelo Project Survey Department Raigarh Tahsil And District - Raigarh (C.G.) ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. N. K. Malaviya, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 10/07/2025 1. Counsel for the Petitioner prays for the following relief(s):- (i)That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to suitably direct the respondents to take decision upon the pending applications for reference i.e. Annexure P-2 within limited periods. (ii)Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts 2 and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction or delaying in forwarding the petitioner’s application under Section 18 of the Land Acquistion Act 1894 to the District Judge Raigarh since 07.10.2021, therefore the petitioner has made application Annexure P/2 but till date the same has not been considered, therefore he prays for a direction to the concerned authorities to forward the petitioner’s case. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondents to consider the pending application, he is having no objection to the limited prayer and if the application of the petitioner is pending, it will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondent-authorities to consider the application (Annexure P/2) of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti