CWP-9842-2001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 205 SHRI PAL SINGH RATH STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: None Mr. Harish Rathi, Sr. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner appeared on their behalf on the last date of hearing as well. 2. The petition has been filed the Policy decision dated pay scale has been been sought to 3. Learned State counsel contends that vide impugned memo dated 19.12.2000, after considering the matter regarding further revision of pay scales of Headmasters of Government High Schools and grant of selection grade to Lecturers of Government Senior Secondary Schools, scale of the Headmasters from 01.08.2000 12000 to the conscious decision was taken keeping in view various administrative qualifications, revision cannot be claimed as a matter of right from any retrospective date. 2001(O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SHRI PAL SINGH RATHI AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA None for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Rathi, Sr. DAG, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner appeared on their behalf on the last date of hearing as well. The petition has been filed seeking a writ of olicy decision dated 19.12.2000, Annexure P has been made effective from 01.08.2000 to make it effective from 01.01.1996 Learned State counsel contends that vide impugned memo dated , after considering the matter regarding further revision of pay Headmasters of Government High Schools and grant of selection grade to Lecturers of Government Senior Secondary Schools, Headmasters, i.e., ₹7500-12000 01.08.2000. The Government also granted the Lecturers limited to twenty per cent of the cadre posts. The conscious decision was taken keeping in view various administrative , job responsibility and other relevant conditions. revision cannot be claimed as a matter of right from any retrospective date. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9842-2001(O&M) Decided On: 07.04.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA DAG, Haryana. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners, none appeared on their behalf on the last date of hearing as well. seeking a writ of certiorari quashing , Annexure P-3, to the extent the revised 01.08.2000; further, a direction has 01.01.1996. Learned State counsel contends that vide impugned memo dated , after considering the matter regarding further revision of pay Headmasters of Government High Schools and grant of selection grade to Lecturers of Government Senior Secondary Schools, the revised pay 12000 was made effective with effect also granted selection grade of ₹7500- twenty per cent of the cadre posts. The conscious decision was taken keeping in view various administrative factors, job responsibility and other relevant conditions. Therefore, this revision cannot be claimed as a matter of right from any retrospective date. , none quashing revised a direction has Learned State counsel contends that vide impugned memo dated , after considering the matter regarding further revision of pay Headmasters of Government High Schools and grant of selection revised pay with effect - twenty per cent of the cadre posts. The , his Aman Dua 2025.04.09 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-9842-2001 4. Keeping in view the facts aforementioned, as also that there is nothing on record a retrospective stands dismissed. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed of. 07.04.2025 Ad 2001(O&M) -2- Keeping in view the facts aforementioned, as also that there is nothing on record to show as to why the revised scales should be a retrospective date, the claimed relief cannot be granted stands dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? Keeping in view the facts aforementioned, as also that there is to show as to why the revised scales should be granted from the claimed relief cannot be granted and the petition Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Keeping in view the facts aforementioned, as also that there is granted from the petition Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) Aman Dua 2025.04.09 19:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document