IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.152 of 2019 ====================================================== Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited Through its Chairman cum Managing Director, 3rd Floor, I D Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Opp. Lalita Hotel, Plot no. 166, Dist. Patna. Appeal and Appellants through the Asst. Manager/ authorized signatory/ Duly Constituted Attorney, 3rd Floor, I D Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Opp. Lalita Hotel, Plot no. 166, Dist. Patna. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. Shyam Sundar Singh S/o Lt. Angad Singh Resident of village- Paharpur, P.S.- Barahiya, Dist. Lakhisarai. 2. Indrashan Devi W/o Shyam Sundar Singh Resident of village - Paharpur, P.S- Barahiya, Dist. Lakhisarai. 3. Tun Tun Singh S/o Mahendra Singh Resident of village - Rajauna Chauki, PO- Manipal Area, Dist. Lakhisarai, at present Kankarbagh, patna,(owner of Truck BR.53A. 9654)- 4. Vilayti Ram S/o Lukhari Rai Resident of Mohalla- Saguna, PS- Danapur, Dist. Patna. 5. Rahul Kumar Sinha S/o Thakur Sitaram Singh Resident of Mohalla- A/14, Anupam Jyoti Co- operative Colony, Behind Astha Motors, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, P.S.- Agamkuan, dist.-Patna (owner of Truck BR.01GB. 8999). 6. Nagendra Singh S/o Mukhdeo Singh Resident of mohalla- Road no. 14A, Ashok Nagar, P.S- Kankarbagh, dist. Patna.20. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Durgesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Saket Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 4 10-10-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present appeal has been preferred: “against the Judgment/Award dated 20.09.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-IX-cum-Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Patna in Claim Case No. Patna High Court MA No.152 of 2019(4) dt.10-10-2025 2/2 3512/2014 (Shyam Sundar Singh & Anr. vs. Tun Tun Singh & Ors.) by which compensation has been allowed against the appellant.” 3. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The statutory amount deposited has to be returned to the appellant. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U