2025:JHHC:32528 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6190 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6190 of 2025 ---- 1. Chanchala Devi, aged about 42 years, wife of Durga Saw, resident of village – Bagodar, Teli Tola, PO and PS – Bagodar, District – Giridih, Jharkhand 2. Jhanawa Devi, aged about 58 years, wife of Mahavir Saw, resident of village – Bagodar, PO and PS – Bagodar, District – Giridih, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Shweta Singh, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Vijay Kr. Roy, Advocate ---- 02/29.10.2025 Mr. Roy, learned counsel submits that he has received the vakalatnama on behalf of the informant and in view of that the vakalatnama of Mr. Roy is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 3. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bagodar P.S. Case No.209 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners along with other 85 women decided to make a committee and to contribute the money in the said committee and it was the scheme 2025:JHHC:32528 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6190 of 2025 that whenever need will arise the members of the committee will be allowed to withdraw the amount. He further submits that the petitioners have also invested the amount in the said committee and the committee was working and the ladies were withdrawing the amount from the said committee. He then submits that the allegations are made that the amount of 7 ladies have not been returned through them. He also submits that the petitioners have received the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and have replied the same. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant opposes the prayer and submits that 7 ladies have not been paid, however, the others have been paid. 6. The involvement of 85 women are there in the said committee and the rest of the ladies have withdrawn the amount, however, the allegations are made that 7 ladies have not been paid and the petitioners have received the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and in that view of the matter the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 29.10.2025 Sangam/