Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32282 (PAT)

Laldev Prasad @ Laldeo Patel v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29424/2025 · 2025-05-08

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29424 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Laldev Prasad @ Laldeo Patel Son of Bhukhal Raut @ Bhukhal Patel Resident of Village - Nauwadih English, P.S.- Paharpur, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1 . The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State . 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3 . Prosecution case is that total 35.280 liters of English liquor and 19 liters of country made liquor was recovered from house of this petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the aforesaid recovery . Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29424 of 2025(2) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 5 . Learned counsel for the State submits that the recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is not entitled to the privilege anticipatory bail in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.). 6. Considering the aforesaid decision of this Court, this pre-arrest bail petition is rejected. Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T