- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:275 CRL.P No. 10785 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10785 OF 2022 BETWEEN: RAJSHEKAR M., S/O KUPPALI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, CONCEPT CITY GROUP, SAHAKARNAGAR, BANGALORE 560 092. …PETITIONER [BY SRI. B.V.M.ADEKAR.,ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: STATE BY KODIGEHALLI POLICE, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI VENKAT SATYANARAYAN, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 504,506,341,420 R/W 34 OF IPC IN C.C.NO.16771/2019 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VII ACMM, BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:275 CRL.P No. 10785 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called in the afternoon session. The order sheet dated 28.10.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. The petition is of the year 2022. The matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. List this matter after one week." Inspite of that, there is no progress in the matter. The petition is of the year 2022. The office objections are not complied with even though the matter is listed for 4th time. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11