Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20220 RSA No. 554 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 554 OF 2014 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT RAMAKKA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS D/O LATE DODDA RAMAPPA W/O SRINIVASAPPA R/AT VOMBATHUGULI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 114
2.
SMT NARAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS D/O LATE DODDA RAMAPPA W/O LATE CHOWDAPPA R/AT THURUVALATTI VILLAGE TEKAL HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 130
3.
SMT CHINNAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS D/O LATE DODDA RAMAPPA W/O SRI RAMAPPA R/AT REDDIHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 101
4.
D NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LATE DODDA RAMAPPA R/AT PARSWANGANAHALLI VILLAGE
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20220 RSA No. 554 of 2014
VOKKALERI HOBLI KOLAR TALUK & DIST – 563 101 …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRA SHEKARA REDDY M V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT KAVITHA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS W/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA R/AT PARSWAGANAHALLI VILLAGE VOKKALERI HOBLI KOLAR TALUK & DIST – 563 101
2.
SRI VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS S/O LATE DODDA RAMAPPA R/AT PARSWANGANAHALLI VILLAGE VOKKALERI HOBLI KOLAR TALUK & DIST – 563 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2 SRI. SURESH L.S. & SRI. R.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 18.1.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.163/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 23.4.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.32/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE, KOLAR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20220 RSA No. 554 of 2014
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal stating that they have settled their dispute out of Court as per registered partition deed dated 22.03.2025 and copy of the registered partition deed is enclosed along with the memo.
2. Memo and Xerox copy of the registered partition deed dated 22.03.2025 is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 7