Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32275 (RAJ)

VIKASH KUMAR S/O SH. RAJESH v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/16720/2024 · 2025-05-27

Sudesh Bansal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22327] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16720/2024 Vikash Kumar S/o Sh. Rajesh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Gandhi Bari, 6 Sdr, Tehsil - Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievance And Pensions, North Block, Cabinet Secretariat, Raisina Hill, New Delhi- 110001. 2. The Chairman, Staff Selection Commission, Block No. 12, C.g.o. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003. 3. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission, Block No. 12, C.g.o. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003. 4. Under Secretary, Staff Selection Commission- Hq, Block No. 12, C.g.o. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003. 5. Deputy Inspector General, Gc-1, Central Reserve Police Force, Golf Course Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Dev Mr. Himanshu for Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nidhi Khandelwal Ms. Anshu Kanwar Mr. Bhagchand Bairwa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 27/05/2025 1. Petitioner preferred instant writ petition, depriving him to re- appear for PST/PET and not considering his candidature for appointment on merits on the post of Constable (GD), pursuant to Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs), SSF and Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles Examination, 2024. [2025:RJ-JP:22327] (2 of 2) [CW-16720/2024] 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that before filing the writ petition, petitioner submitted a Representation raising his grievance. His representation has been considered by the respondents and thereafter, after allowing him to appear in the PST/PET, his candidature has been considered on merits and posting has also been offered. 3. In view of subsequent event, counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/129