- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2503 RFA No. 1482 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1482 OF 2017 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HORTICULTURE DEPARTMENT, BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANANGARA PALIKE, SOUTH RANGE, JAYANAGARA, BANGALORE-560 003. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. C.SHANKAR REDDY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. JNESHWAR NAIK.A S/O A.BALAKRISHNA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.139, SATYANARAYANA LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, IV BLOCK, BASAVESHWARA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 079. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V.SATISH., ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2503 RFA No. 1482 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.K.V.Satish., counsel for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 13.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 21.01.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel for the appellants. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 83