Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3227 (AP)

Shaik Shabbir v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/878/2024 · 2025-08-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010012592024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 878/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK SHABBIR, S/O.SHAIK BABU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.28-3-170, 3RD MILE, MYPADU ROAD, NAVALAKUTHOTA, SPSRNELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE RURAL, SPSRNELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, V TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening a suspect sheet vide 88 on the file of the 5th Respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of AP Standing orders consequently to set aside the same and pass The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: 2 “ .... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in opening a suspect sheet vide 88 on the file of the 5th Respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of AP Standing orders consequently to set aside the same and pass ....” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Police on instructions would submit that no rowdy sheet is opened against the Petitioner and this writ petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is allowed. The Proceedings dated 07.01.2014 passed by respondent Police are hereby set aside. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 878 of 2024 19.08.2025 Mjl /*