Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32267 (AP)

Shaik Shaheen v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22357/2018 · 2025-03-25

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010475172018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 22357/2018 Between: Shaik Shaheen ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VENKATA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) 2. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature or Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents Nos.2 to 5 in not appointing the petitioner as AWW of ICDS Project in furtherance of selection list vide proceedings R.C.No.166//Aa/2016 dated 20.10.2017 as arbitrary, illegal bad in law violative of Articles 14, 16 and 19(1)(g) of the Construction of India and consequently, direct the respondents 2 to 5 the selection of the 6th respondent appointment was canceled and issue appointment to the petitioner with all consequential and attendant benefits.” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 2 4. Learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare and Sri Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned counsel for respondent No.6 are in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 22357 of 2018 25.03.2025 Mjl /*