PARDEEP ALIAS GUJJAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/2343/2025 · 2025-07-01
Amarjot Bhatti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32263 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32263 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-2343-2025 -1-
104
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-2343-2025
Date of Decision:-01.07.2025
Pardeep alias Gujjar
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and Ors. ...Respondents
CORAM:-HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI
Present:- Mr. Randeep S.Dhull, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
****
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
1. Petitioner – Pardeep alias Gujjar has filed criminal writ petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India read with Section 3 of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order passed by respondent No.2 viz. Divisional Commissioner, Karnal dated 26.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) whereby the request of present petitioner for grant of regular parole for a period of 61 days has been declined.
2. Status report is filed by Deputy Superintendent of Prison, District Prison, Karnal confirming the fact that case of regular parole of petitioner for 10 weeks was sent to District Magistrate, Sonipat vide letter No.2038- 41 dated 20.02.2024. The report was received from Deputy Commissioner of Police Headquarter, Sonipat and on that basis the temporary release of prisoner was not recommended by District Magistrate, Sonipat vide Endst.
SUNIL DEVI 2025.07.04 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-2343-2025 -2-
No.1776/R dated 09.12.2024.
3. Now the case of petitioner for 10 weeks regular parole has again been recommended and forwarded to District Magistrate, Sonipat and currently the case of petitioner is pending with competent authority i.e. Divisional Commissioner Karnal Division, Karnal for final decision.
4. In view of the aforesaid factual position, no purpose would be served by continuing with the present criminal writ petition, especially when fresh application of the petitioner for regular parole has been recommended and currently pending for decision by the competent authority.
Therefore, present criminal writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the official respondents to dispose of the current application of petitioner received in their office seeking regular parole as per law within a period of three weeks.
5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well.
01.07.2025
(AMARJOT BHATTI) Sunil Devi
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No SUNIL DEVI 2025.07.04 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document