- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1490 RFA No. 1840 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1840 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M.MUNIANJANAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.68, 1ST CROSS, VADDARAPALYA, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043. 2. SRI M.NAGARAJ S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT VENKATADRI NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, CHIKKAYELLAPPA ROAD, VADDARAPALYA, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. DIVYA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.SESHAGIRI RAO., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RAJAMMA D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, W/O SAMPANGIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.59, 4TH CROSS, HENNUR CROSS, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 043. 2. SMT. PARVATHAMMA D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1490 RFA No. 1840 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT OPP. TO SRI LAKSHMI, VENKATESHWARA TEMPLE, KONDASAPURA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560 049. 3. SRI M.KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.70, PRASHANTH NILAYA, 1ST CROSS, VADDARA PALYA, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043. 4. SMT ANJINAMMA W/O LATE DEVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 5. SMT CHAYADEVI.D D/O LATE DEVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, THE RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.68, 3RD 'A'CROSS, CHIKKAYELLAPPA ROAD, VADDARA PALYA, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.P.LEELADHAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 READ WITH 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1490 RFA No. 1840 of 2022 ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 15.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellants have not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4