Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 111 of 2014 Date of Decision : 13.10.2025 Desh Deepak ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : None. For respondent No.1 : Mr. Amit Himalwi, Advocate. For respondent No.2-State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) As per report made on the bailable warrants, the sole petitioner/accused has died; hence, the proceedings have abated against him and the criminal revision is dismissed as having been abated, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 13th October, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.