Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32254 (RAJ)

C.R. GOYAL S/O LATE SHRI BABULAL GOYAL v. SHRI BHAWANI SINGH DETHA

CCP/1093/2022 · 2025-08-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1093/2022 C.r. Goyal S/o Late Shri Babulal Goyal, Aged About 70 Years, R/o 13, Ambey Bhawan, Shakti Nagar, Behind Shiva Talkies, Sahyog Nagar Colony, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Bhawani Singh Detha, Additional Chief Secretary/secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Shuchi Tyagi, Commissioner, College Education, Dr, Radha Krishnan Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary/ Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hariom Yadav on behalf of Mr. J.K. Moolchandani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Divanshu Gupta, AGC with Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar on behalf of Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/08/2025 1. Vide order dated 02.05.2022, the Court allowed the writ petition bearing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.26947/2018 in compliance of the order dated 30.09.2021 in the case of Dr. Laxmi Narayan Arya vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10536/2018. 2. The petitioner was held to be entitled for Senior and Selection Scale and other benefits under the Career Advancement [2025:RJ-JP:32544] (2 of 2) [CCP-1093/2022] Scheme (CAS) by taking into account the temporary services from 09.09.1976 to 23.09.1982. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that compliance of the order has been made by issuing order dated 06.07.2023 (Annexure- CR/1), whereby the Senior and Selection Scale granted to the petitioner were revised and they are allowed the same benefits w.e.f. 09.09.1992. 4. Further necessary orders have also been issued which have been placed on record as Annexures- CR/2 and CR/3. 5. In view of the issuance of orders (Annexures CR/1 to CR/3), the Court finds that the compliance of order has been made. 6. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands disposed of. 7. Notices stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/188