Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:101378 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9770 of 2025 Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Jaiswal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Ankesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ruchi Misra, learned State Law Officer and perused the record.
2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 09 of 2025, under Sections 61(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 339, 340(2) of B.N.S., P.S. Rajghat, District Gorakhpur.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of statement of co-accused persons, who were allegedly arrested police at the time of preparation to open the bank account on the basis of forged documents. He further submits that main accused namely Satish Chand Singh and Pranay Srivastava have already been granted bail vide orders dated 30.05.2025 and 18.06.2025 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application Nos. 13473 if 2025 and 19622 of 2025 respectively. Applicant is claiming parity with the co-accused persons. It is further submitted that criminal history of two cases has been explained in para no. 12 of the affidavit. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since
12.01.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the
liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.
4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
6. Let the applicant- Praveen Kumar Jaiswal, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by her.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 1.7.2025/Ruhi H. Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad