Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32236 (JHR)

ABHISHEK SAW ALIAS ABHISHEK KUMAR ALIAS ABISHEK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7185/2025 · 2025-12-17

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:37938 --1-- A.B.A. No. 7185 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7185 of 2025 ---- Abhishek Saw @ Abhishek Kumar @ Abishek Kumar, aged about 28 years, S/o Dilip Saw @ Dilip Kumar Gupta, resident of village – Karodih, PO – Sapamaran, PS – Dhanwar, District – Giridih, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Advocate ---- 03/17.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No.101 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 189(2), 103(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner of assault and pursuant to that death has occurred. On this ground, he submits that the anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegation against all the accused persons are 2025:JHHC:37938 --2-- A.B.A. No. 7185 of 2025 there of assault and pursuant to that death has occurred of the deceased and two of the persons have been granted regular bail and in view of that the petitioner may kindly move before the learned Court for regular bail application. 5. In paragraph No.18 and 19 of the case diary which has been recorded in the order of learned Sessions Judge it has come that the witnesses have supported the case of the informant and have categorically stated that the son of the informant was murdered by the petitioner and others. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 17.12.2025 Sangam/