[2025:RJ-JP:6044] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14043/2023 Buddhraj @ Buddhram S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Chharoda, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Siyaram Meena S/o Nathulal, Resident Of Charoda, P.s. Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Vyas For Respondent(s) For complainant(s) : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Ashindra Gautam HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/02/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.PC filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in F.I.R. No.235/2023 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) for offences under Sections 420, 466, 468 & 471 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that vide order dated 08.11.2023, interim protection from arrest was granted to the petitioner. Counsel submits that in terms of the said order, petitioner has joined the investigation and since then, period of more than one year has lapsed and petitioner has not misused the liberty so granted to [2025:RJ-JP:6044] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14043/2023] him. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not more required in the present case. 3. Learned State Counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that interim protection was granted to the petitioner on 08.11.2023 and since then, he has not misused the liberty of bail; he has already joined the investigation, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) in F.I.R. No.235/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Buddhraj @ Buddhram S/o Shankar Lal, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2025:RJ-JP:6044] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14043/2023] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /31