IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 NIC Karnail Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) was passed by this Court: has been informed telephonically about the date fixed. However, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant been called twice. Even learned counsel for the appellant has not supplied the copy of paper liberty to the appellant period of 06 weeks 25.08.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO Date of Decision: Versus Karnail Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) This is a fully burnt case. On the last date of hearing i.e. 27.01.2025, following order was passed by this Court:- “Learned counsel for the appellant seeks locate the case file in his office and to collect the details of the case from the appellant-NIC to reconstruct the present case file. Adjourned to 25.08.2025. Office report indicates that learned counsel for the appellant informed telephonically about the date fixed. However, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant been called twice. Even learned counsel for the appellant has not supplied the copy of paper-book in order to reconstr In view of the above, the instant appeal is liberty to the appellant-NIC, to move an appropriate application within a 06 weeks from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1155-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA On the last date of hearing i.e. 27.01.2025, following order “Learned counsel for the appellant seeks some time to locate the case file in his office and to collect the details of NIC to reconstruct the present Adjourned to 25.08.2025.” Office report indicates that learned counsel for the appellant informed telephonically about the date fixed. However, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant-NIC, despite the case having been called twice. Even learned counsel for the appellant has not supplied book in order to reconstruct the file. , the instant appeal is disposed of, with , to move an appropriate application within a from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No On the last date of hearing i.e. 27.01.2025, following order some time to locate the case file in his office and to collect the details of NIC to reconstruct the present Office report indicates that learned counsel for the appellant informed telephonically about the date fixed. However, none has , despite the case having been called twice. Even learned counsel for the appellant has not supplied with , to move an appropriate application within a RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.28 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.