Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32226 (MAD)

Periya Nambiraja v. THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

CRL OP/6073/2025 · 2025-03-05

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP NO.6073 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO.6073 of 2025 Periya Nambiraja Petitioner Vs State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police T-19, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District (Crime No.52 of 2025) Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner / Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 52 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner(s): Mr.Arulprakash D For Respondent(s):Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the BNS in Crime No. 52 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP NO.6073 of 2025 anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused had attacked the de facto complainant and robbed 1 ½ sovereigns and two mobile phones. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the stolen articles were recovered from the first accused and in any case custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and sought for anticipatory bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted the petitioner has 8 previous cases of which one is registered under Section 376 of IPC and others are registered under 379, 397 and 427 of IPC and that he is a habitual offender. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and also perused the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP NO.6073 of 2025 materials available on record. 6. Considering the nature of the allegations, the fact that the petitioner has bad antecedents and that he is a history sheeter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 05.03.2025 vca To The Inspector Of Police T-19, Kelambakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District (Crime No.52 of 2025) SUNDER MOHAN,J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP NO.6073 of 2025 vca CRL OP NO.6073 of 2025 05.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis