173 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA BIRBAL DASS BHAGIRATH SINGH MEENA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Pankaj Garg, HARKESH MANUJA By way of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent on account of alleged willful non-compliance of directions issued by the Hon’b Court in Writ petition(Criminal) No.68 of 2008 titled as Vs. Gov. Of U.P. and Ors.” Present contempt proceedings have been sought to be initiated with the averments that despite information having provided by the petitioner about commission of cognizable offence, FIR has not been registered by the respondent. Having through the paper to the petitioner 19.05.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: BIRBAL DASS Versus BHAGIRATH SINGH MEENA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent on account of alleged compliance of directions issued by the Hon’b Court in Writ petition(Criminal) No.68 of 2008 titled as Vs. Gov. Of U.P. and Ors.” vide judgment dated 12.11.2013. Present contempt proceedings have been sought to be initiated with the averments that despite information having provided by the petitioner about commission of cognizable offence, FIR has not been registered by the respondent. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the paper-book, the present petition is disposed of with liberty oner to avail his alternate remedies in accordance with law. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1268-2025 Date of Decision: May 19, 2025 ........Petitioner BHAGIRATH SINGH MEENA AND OTHERS ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. By way of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent on account of alleged compliance of directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Writ petition(Criminal) No.68 of 2008 titled as “Lalita Kumari vide judgment dated 12.11.2013. Present contempt proceedings have been sought to be initiated with the averments that despite information having been provided by the petitioner about commission of cognizable offence, FIR has not been registered by the respondent. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone he present petition is disposed of with liberty remedies in accordance with law. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2025 May 19, 2025 By way of present petition filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent on account of alleged le Supreme Lalita Kumari Present contempt proceedings have been sought to be been provided by the petitioner about commission of cognizable offence, FIR heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone he present petition is disposed of with liberty TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.21 09:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document