Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32223 (RAJ)

SATISH CHAND OJHA SON OF LATE SHRI MADANLAL JI OJHA v. SHAKINA BANO

CW/19547/2024 · 2025-01-21

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2853] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19547/2024 1. Satish Chand Ojha Son Of Late Shri Madanlal Ji Ojha, (Since Deceased During Suit) 1/1. Smt. Pushpa Ojha W/o Late Shri Satish Chand Ojha, Resident Of House No. 1591, Jadiyo Ka Rasta, Opposite Halvai Samiti Dharmshala, Near Hanuman Ji Temple, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.). 1/2. Ashwani Ojha Son Of Late Shri Satish Chand Ojha, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of House No. 1591, Jadiyo Ka Rasta, Opposite Halvai Samiti Dharmshala, Near Hanuman Ji Temple, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.). 1/3. Tanu Ojha D/o Late Shri Satish Chand Ojha, Resident Of House No. 1591, Jadiyo Ka Rasta, Opposite Halvai Samiti Dharmshala, Near Hanuman Ji Temple, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shakina Bano, W/o Mangtuddin 2. Mohammad Salim Son Of Shri Mangtuddin, Resident Of House No. 5002, Behind Kali Ka Kotha, Sanjay Bazar, Ghatgate, Jaipur (Raj.), Shopkeeper, Shop No. 1590, House No. 1591, Jadiyo Ka Rasta, Opposite Halvai Samiti Ki Dharmshala, Near Hanuman Ji Temple, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Shiv Shanker Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 21/01/2025 1. This petition is filed seeking directions to the Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur (for short ‘the Tribunal’) to [2025:RJ-JP:2853] (2 of 2) [CW-19547/2024] decide Application No. 38/2015 titled as Sakina Bano & Anr. Vs. Satish Chand Ojha in a time bound manner. 2. The grievance raised is that the eviction suit was filed by the petitioner-landlord in the year 2014. Due to non-appearance, the respondent-tenant was proceeded ex-parte. The application was filed in the year 2015 under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC and reply to the application was filed in the year 2016 but the same is pending till date. 3. Without commenting upon merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with direction to the Tribunal that the application filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC shall be decided within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/9