Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32222 (PNJ)

PARVEEN KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/9276/2025 · 2025-04-01

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-9276-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 143 PARVEEN KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondents to because he was entitled to i.e. in December, 2002, year 2015. 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. 4. notice on behalf of the respondents representation, dated respondent/Director, Secondary Education order in accordance with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: PARVEEN KUMAR Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. R. S. Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondents to shift the petitioner under the Old he was entitled to ex-gratia benefit at the time of i.e. in December, 2002, however, the benefit was granted to him only in the Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioner will be satisfied in case second pending representation, dated 01.02.2025 specified period. Notice of motion. Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Additional A. G., Haryana notice on behalf of the respondents/State , dated 01.02.2025, will be decided by Director, Secondary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9276-2025 Date of Decision: 01.04.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing shift the petitioner under the Old Pension Scheme regime benefit at the time of death of his father however, the benefit was granted to him only in the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this second respondent is directed to 01.02.2025, Annexure P-4, in a Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Additional A. G., Haryana, accepts and submits that the pending will be decided by the second by passing a speaking/reasoned a period of three months. directing Scheme regime his father however, the benefit was granted to him only in the submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a accepts the pending second /reasoned Aman Dua 2025.04.02 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-9276-2025 5. petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. 7. officer concerned shall pay costs of 01.04.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.04.02 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document