RAJBEER SINGH S/O SHRI NEKIRAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19732/2024 · 2025-07-10
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32216 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32216 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19732/2024 Rajbeer Singh S/o Shri Nekiram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Bahadurwas, Panchayat Samiti Mandawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To Government, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur Division, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. The District Collector Jhunjhunu, (Rajasthan).
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
5. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Mandawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
6. The Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Bahadurwas, Panchayat Samiti Mandawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
7. The Gram Panchayat Bahadurwas, Panchayat Samiti Mandawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu Through Its Sarpanch (Raj.).
8. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur-AAG JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/07/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned patta issued in favour of respondent for
(2 of 2) [CW-19732/2024] construction of Sub Health Center at Village Phuskani, Panchayat Samiti Mandawa, District Jhunjhunu.
2. In the considered opinion of this Court, a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable in such like matter. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved by issuance of the aforesaid patta, he is at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievance.
3. The present writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. In case, the petitioner files a representation before the appropriate forum of law, it is expected from the said forum to decide the same, strictly in accordance with law as early as possible.
4. Stay application and all pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/11