Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32214 (CHH)

NEM SINGH VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7043/2025 · 2025-07-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:33119 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7043 of 2025 1 - Nem Singh Verma S/o Bhukhan Singh Verma Aged About 37 Years Presently Posted At The Government Middle School Badan, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Divisional Joint Director Education Division District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector District Kabirdham C.G. 5 - District Education Officer, District Kabirdham C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 15/07/2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Middle School, Bandhatola, ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:02 +0530 2 Block Sahaspur Lohara, District Kabirdham to Govt. Middle School, Badna, Block Pandariya, under the rationalization instructions. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has joined but still she wants to make her fresh representation. He would further submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok