IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.986 of 2025 ------ 1. Manjoor Ansari @ Manjur Ansari, aged about 41 years Son of Late. Jahir Ansari Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S- Ranka, District- Garhwa. 2. Munir Ahamad @ Munir Ansari @ Manir Ansari aged about 49 years Son of Late Naim Miya Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S- Ranka, District- Garhwa. 3. Masuddin Ansari @ Masihuddin Ansari, aged about 32 years Son of Late Naim Ansari Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S- Ranka, District- Garhwa. 4. Shameer Ansari @ Samsher Ansari, aged about 37 years Son of Late Naim Ansari Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S- Ranka, District- Garhwa 5. Kalim Ansari, aged about 51 years Son of Late Late Alim Ansari Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S- Ranka, District- Garhwa 6. Aminuddin Ansari, aged about 48 years Son of Late Alim Ansari Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S.- Ranka, District- Garhwa 7. Ijarail Ansari @ Izrail Ansari, aged about 34 years Son of Late Alim Ansari Resident of Village- Khapro P.O- and P.S- Ranka, District- Garhwa. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Md. Hadish Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-13-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Ranka P.S. Case No.127 of 2024 instituted under Sections 191(1)/191(2)/109 of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly attempted to murder Adil Ansari. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that there was a free fight between the parties and from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner No.2 lodged Ranka P.S. Case No.128 of 2024. It is then submitted that the genesis of occurrence is a land dispute. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Garhwa in connection with Ranka P.S. Case No.127 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/