2025:JHHC:37909 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No.396 of 2015 ------ Sukhdeo Manjhi, son of Late Motaka Manjhi @ Maniram Manjhi, Resident of Village-Gampur, P.O.-Mahuatand, P.S.-Mahuatand, District-Bokaro (Jharkhand) …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. Sri Tulram Nayak, The Commissioner, Region-2, Coal Mines Provident Fund (C.M.P.F.), Metheyor Building, Near Ranchi Railway Station, Chutia, P.O. & P.S.-Chutia, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand); 2. Sri Pushpa Haffa, The Personnel Officer, Ara Colliery, Central Coalfields Limited, At & P.O.-Kuju, P.S.-Mandu, District-Ramgarh (Jharkhand); 3. C.C.L., Darbhaga House, Ranchi Through Chairman cum Managing Director C.C.L. namely Gopal Singh, At & P.O.- Dharbhanga, House, Ranchi, P.S.-Kotwali, Dist-Ranchi. .... .... Opp. Parties CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate For the CMPF : Mr. Romit Kumar, Advocate For the CCL : Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Praveen Tirkey, Advocate ------ 08/Dated: 17.12.2025 1. Mr. Lalit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that the petitioner has died and as such, he is to be represented by the legal heirs. He has also submitted that the instruction has been received from the legal heirs to move an appropriate application for getting the succession certificate for the purpose of establishing the claim of the C.M.P.F. amount. 2025:JHHC:37909 2 2. There is no opposition either by the learned counsel for the Opp. Party-C.M.P.F., as also, learned counsel for the Opp. Party-CCL. 3. This Court, considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner, is disposing of the instant contempt case with a liberty to the legal heirs of the present petitioner to file an appropriate application for getting succession certificate before the competent court of civil jurisdiction. 4. If the legal heirs of the petitioner will produce the succession certificate, the concerned respondent will take appropriate decision in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the instant contempt case stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 17.12.2025 Rohit/-