Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32203 (RAJ)

PARTEEK DUDI S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR DUDI v. RAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

CW/16530/2024 · 2025-01-23

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3426] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16530/2024 Parteek Dudi S/o Shri Rameshwar Dudi, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Athuni Dhani, Village Kalwa Bada, Tehsil Makrana, District Nagaur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Sector- 18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur Through Its Registrar. 2. Controller Of Examinations, Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Sector-18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. National Medical Commissions, Pocket- 14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase-I, New Delhi- 110077 India Through President 4. Principal, S.k. Medical College, Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. I. Abbasi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Angad Mirdha Mr. Yash Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 23/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 12.12.2024 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in SBCWP No. 16105/2024 titled as Devraj & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. and judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of Principal seat of Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur passed in SBCWP No. 15880/2024 titled as Tanmay vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:3426] (2 of 2) [CW-16530/2024] Considering the akin controversy, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present writ petition be decided in light of the afore stated judgments. Learned counsel for the respondents has not refuted the said contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid judgments, this Court is of the view that the same ratio is ought to be made applicable herein. Resultantly, the instant petition is allowed in terms of the ratio encapsulated in Devraj (supra) and the amended guidelines. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. Howsoever, it is clarified that the present judgment shall not be treated as a precedent. No orders are passed as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /386