(2025:JHHC:32446) Cr.M.P. No.1514 of 2020 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1514 of 2020 1. Farheen Siddiqui Qamar @ Farheen Siddiqui, aged about 29 years, wife of Aftab Qamar and daughter of Afsaruddin Siddiqui 2. Afsaruddin Sidiqui, aged about 55 years, son of late Misbahuddin Sidiqui 3. Seema Parween, aged about 51 years, wife of Afsaruddin Siddiqui 4. Gufran Siddqui, aged about 18 years, 5. Farhan Siddiqui, aged about 22 years 6. Babu Siddiqui @ Farazuddin Siddiqi (Babu), aged about 25 years Sl. No.4 to 6 all sons of Afsaruddin Siddiqui Sl. No.1 to 6 all residents of 95/25, Farras Khana, Nai Sadak, P.O. & P.S.-Bekangunj, Dist.-Kanpur, Uttar Pardesh-208001 .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Md. Nezam, son of Mr. Moula Bakhsh, aged about 62 years, presently residing at Islam Nagar, P.O.-Kapali, P.S.-Chandil, Dist.- Seraikella, Kharsawan …. Opp. Parties P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ….. For the Petitioners : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Niranjan Singh, Advocate : Mr. Hatim, Advocate ….. By the Court:- 1. Heard the parties. 2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding including the order (2025:JHHC:32446) Cr.M.P. No.1514 of 2020 2 dated 16.02.2018 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum in connection with C-1 Case No. 2142 of 2017 whereby and whereunder, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum has taken cognizance for the offences punishable under Section 323, 341, 504, 427/34 of Indian Penal Code. 3. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner no.1 being the daughter-in-law of the complainant and the petitioner nos.2 to 6 being the relatives of the petitioner no.1 have invited the complainant for a discussion, in the Jubilee Park and assaulted him and committed theft of his money from his pocket and broke his spectacle. 4. On the basis of the complaint, statement of the complainant on solemn affirmation and the statement of the inquiry witnesses, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum has found prima facie case for the said offences, as already indicated above and passed orders for issue of summons to the petitioners. 5. Relying upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Neelu Chopra & Anr. vs. Bharti reported in (2009) 10 SCC 184, paragraph no.9 of which reads as under:- ‘’9. In order to lodge a proper complaint, mere mention of the sections and the language of those sections is not the be all and end all of the matter. What is required to be brought to the notice of the court is the particulars of the offence committed by each and every accused and the role played by each and every accused in committing of that offence.’’ it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there is absolutely no material in the record to suggest the particulars of the offence committed by each of the petitioners and admittedly (2025:JHHC:32446) Cr.M.P. No.1514 of 2020 3 petitioner no.1 instituted a case involving the offence punishable under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code against the complainant and his family members and for wreaking vengeance, this false case has been foisted. 6. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the trial has not yet begun and the case is at the stage of appearance. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and concocted as well as vague and vexatious. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this criminal miscellaneous petition be allowed. 7. Learned Special Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer and submits that the allegation made against the petitioners are sufficient to constitute each of the offences for which cognizance has been taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum. Hence, it is submitted that this criminal miscellaneous petition being without any merit be dismissed. 8. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that the undisputed fact remains that the petitioner no.1 first instituted Bekangunj P.S. Case No. 102 of 2017 in the District of Kanpur Town in the State of Uttar Pradesh on 2016-17. Admittedly, all the petitioners are resident of Kanpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The complainant is a resident of Chandil in Seraikella- Karsawan. There is no explanation as to what was the occasion for the persons to assemble at Jubilee Park in Jamshedpur. The (2025:JHHC:32446) Cr.M.P. No.1514 of 2020 4 complainant himself has not taken any name of any accused persons, of having done any specific act. It is not forthcoming as to who caused hurt to the complainant. There is no specific allegation as to who wrongfully restrained the complainant nor there is any specific allegation as to who did the mischief. Under such circumstances, this Court has no hesitation in holding that from reading between the lines, it is crystal clear that this case has falsely been foisted for wreaking vengeance to counter the earlier case instituted by the petitioner no.1 against the complainant and his family members vide Bekangunj P.S. Case No. 102 of 2017. 9. Under such circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that continuation of the criminal proceeding against the petitioners will amount to abuse of process of law and this is a fit case where the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 16.02.2018 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum in connection with C-1 Case No. 2142 of 2017 be quashed and set aside. 10. Accordingly, the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 16.02.2018 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum in connection with C-1 Case No. 2142 of 2017 is quashed and set aside. 11. In the result, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 29th October, 2025 AFR/Sonu-Gunjan/- Uploaded on 31/10/2025