Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3220 (BOM)

PRADNYA WD/O. SHARADKUMAR TALE v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI AND ANR.

WP/3672/2025 · 2026-06-17

Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Rajnish R Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 28-wp 3672.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3672 OF 2025 ( PRADNYA WD/O. SHARADKUMAR TALE VS STATE OF MAHA., THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., DEPT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MUMBAI AND ANR. ) Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or the directions, Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Mr. I.G.Meshram, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs.H.S.Dhande, AGP for respondent No.1. Mr. Apurv De, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATE : JUNE 17, 2026 1) After having heard both sides and having gone through the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979, we find that the petitioner has efficacious statutory remedy available in terms of Rule 17 read with Rule 18 thereof. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the said remedy. 2) The petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. ( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. ) ( ANIL L. PANSARE, J. ) KOLHE 2026:BHC-NAG:7712-DB