Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32197 (KAR)

VINOD v. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE

WP/21664/2023 · 2025-04-01

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13691 WP No. 21664 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 21664 OF 2023 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. VINOD S/O PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO.S-11, INNOVATION, NEAR ANJINEYASWAMY TEMPE, HARIJANA COLONY, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 076 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISHKUMAR R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE AT CORPORATION CIRCLE, N R SQUARE BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WARD NO.175, (DEVARCHIKKANAHALLI), BBMP, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 076 Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13691 WP No. 21664 of 2023 3. M.A. SRIDHAR KUMAR NO.188, 6TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, NRUPATHUNGA NAGAR, J P NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 078 4. GOWRAMMA NO.188, 6TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, NRUPATHUNGA NAGAR, J P NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 078 5. UMESH KUMAR NO.188, 6TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, NRUPATHUNGA NAGAR, J P NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE - 560 078 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARTHIKEYAN B S., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 15.09.2023 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ANNEXURE-B AND TAKE NECESSARY ACTIONS AGAINST THE R3, 4 AND 5 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal reading as hereunder: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13691 WP No. 21664 of 2023 "The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has relocated to another area and because of his persistent ill-health is unable to prosecute the said petition and therefore, intends to withdraw the above captioned petition. Hence, this memo seeking withdrawal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and equity." The memo is taken on record. 2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP