Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32197 (CHH)

Hemlal Dadsena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

CRA/61/2016 · 2025-03-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 61 of 2016 Hemlal Dadsena versus State Of Chhattisgarh Order Sheet 04/03/2025 Vaibhav/Alok None for the appellant even after repeated calls. Ms. Isha Jajodiya, P. L. for the State/respondent. Since the appeal is pending since 2016 and learned counsel for the appellant is not appeared in repeated calls, therefore, this Court constraint to proceed for hearing of the appeal by appointing counsel for legal aid. Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate who is present before this Court, is requested to assist in the case and argue the case on behalf of the appellant. The High Court Legal Services Authority is directed to issue necessary instruction in favour of Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate as the counsel for the appellant. With the consent of the parties the matter is heard finally and judgment dictated separately. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.04.03 19:18:17 +0530