APHC010473182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25195 OF 2025 Between: 1. NUSUM SREENIVASULU @ SREENU, S/o. late Nusum Venkataiah, aged about 51 Years, R/o. Marthoma Nagar, Near Polytechnic College, Gopavaram Mandal, Badvel Town and Municipality, Y.S.R (Kadapa) District, Andhra Prades 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh 3. The Tahsildar, Gopavaram Mandal, 4. The Station House Officer, Badvel Urban Police Station, YSR (Kadapa) District. 5. The SubInspector, Badvel Urban Police Station, YSR (Kadapa) District. 6. Sure Padma Padmavathi, W/o. Late Subramanyam, aged about 44 Years, R/o. Marthoma Nagar, Badvel Town and Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 25195 OF 2025 1. NUSUM SREENIVASULU @ SREENU, S/o. late Nusum Venkataiah, aged about 51 Years, R/o. Marthoma Nagar, Near Polytechnic College, Gopavaram Mandal, Badvel Town and Municipality, Y.S.R (Kadapa) District, ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh 3. The Tahsildar, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District 4. The Station House Officer, Badvel Urban Police Station, YSR (Kadapa) 5. The SubInspector, Badvel Urban Police Station, YSR (Kadapa) District. 6. Sure Padma Padmavathi, W/o. Late Subramanyam, aged about 44 Years, Marthoma Nagar, Badvel Town and Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. NUSUM SREENIVASULU @ SREENU, S/o. late Nusum Venkataiah, aged about 51 Years, R/o. Marthoma Nagar, Near Polytechnic College, Gopavaram Mandal, Badvel Town and Municipality, Y.S.R (Kadapa) District, ..Petitioner 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR (Kadapa) District, Andhra Pradesh 4. The Station House Officer, Badvel Urban Police Station, YSR (Kadapa) 5. The SubInspector, Badvel Urban Police Station, YSR (Kadapa) District. 6. Sure Padma Padmavathi, W/o. Late Subramanyam, aged about 44 Years, Marthoma Nagar, Badvel Town and Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 and 5 in interfering with the matters of civil disputes pertains to the land admeasuring Ac.0.17 cents in Survey No.811 of Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District and threatening to settle the disputes in between the petitioner and the respondent No.6 arising out of the civil suit vide O.S.No.515 of 2023 on the file of Honhle Principal Junior Civil Judge, Badvel as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to land an extent of Ac.0.17 cents in Survey No.811 of Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 8& 5 not to interfere in civil disputes pertains to land an extent of Ac.0.17 cents in Survey No.811 of Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25195 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 and 5 in interfering with the matters of civil disputes pertains to the land admeasuring Ac.0.17 cents in Survey No.811 of Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District and threatening to settle the disputes in between the petitioner and the respondent No.6 arising out of the civil suit vide O.S.No.515 of 2023 on the file of Honhle Principal Junior Civil Judge, Badvel as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to land an extent of Ac.0.17 cents in Survey No.811 of Madakalavaripalli Village, Gopavaram Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District and pass such..” 2. Heard Sri Shaik Mohammed Ismail, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that since the subject dispute is civil in nature, the police authorities are not interfering in the civil dispute, particularly a civil suit is already pending between the parties. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 5. Having regard to the submissions and in view of the fact that the civil suit between the parties is already pending before the competent civil court, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are required in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the competent civil court where the civil proceedings are pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stands closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.09.2025. KKV 136 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25195 OF 2025 18.09.2025 KKV