[2025:RJ-JP:13429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13109/2024 Govind Meghwal S/o Rooplal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Trilokpura Police Station Soyat Dist. Agar (M.p.) At Present Satish Sharma Ki Factory Kudayala Police Station Ramganjmandi, Dist. Kota (Raj.) (Petitioner is in Sub Jail Ramganjmandi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shazadi Bano, Adv. For Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.347/2023, registered at Police Station Suket, District Kota Rural, for the offence(s) under Section 302 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the entire case rest upon circumstantial evidence and the petitioner did not cause murder of the deceased. The deceased was residing with the accused petitioner but she was found dead at some other place. There is no substantive evidence available on record to implicate the present petitioner in the alleged crime, [2025:RJ-JP:13429] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13109/2024] there is no last seen evidence available on record. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 19.10.2023 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is alleged against the accused petitioner that he committed the murder of the deceased by hitting at her head. The deceased sustained head injury and the postmortem report shows presence of other injuries on the dead body of the deceased. The death of the deceased was caused due to brain hemorrhage and shock. It is also contended that at the instance of the petitioner stick was recovered, the police also collected several evidence from the place of occurrence and they have been sent to FSL for DNA matching, there are enough material available on the record to show that the accused-petitioner was involved in causing the murder of the deceased, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits, it is alleged against the accused-petitioner that he was residing with the deceased and prior to the incident they fought with each other, thereafter the deceased was found dead and multiple injuries were found on the body of the deceased, the police has collected evidences from the crime seen and sent it for FSL for DNA matching, the DNA report is pending and not available on record. At the instance of the petitioner stick was recovered, therefore, considering the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:13429] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13109/2024] 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application of the accused- petitioner is hereby by dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-82