M/s Megha Leasing and Marketing Gaggal Vs. Gopal Singh Cr. Appeal No. 333 of 2012 15.10.2025 Present: Mr. Sahil Dixit, Advocate, vice Mr. Jai Ram, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent-State. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed the registered AD cover containing the endorsement that the appellant/addressee has left the place without instructions and submits that he has no instruction to appear because of the endorsement made on the registered AD cover. The Court had issued a notice on the previous date of hearing to the appellant which is duly served for today. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The present appeal is filed against the order of acquittal. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant despite service. Hence the present appeal is dismissed for non prosecution, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 15th October, 2025 (Chander)