- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7749-DB CCC No. 910 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CCC NO. 910 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. JALAJA ALIAS GANGA ALIAS GANGAMMA W/O. VENKATESH M., AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NEAR MUTTURAYASWAMY TEMPLE, MANGANAHALLI, SULIKERE POST, BENGALURU - 560 060. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI C. KARTHIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. RAMESH S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT AGED MAJOR, THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT OFFICE, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 064. 2. N. BHAGIRATHI D/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT AGED MAJOR THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KODIGEHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYAT Digitally signed by CHAITHRA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7749-DB CCC No. 910 of 2024 KODIGEHALLI, KODIGEHALLI POST YESHWANTHPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 112. 3. MR. RAMESH V.T., S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPLAINANT AGED MAJOR, TALUK SURVEYOR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK DEPARTMENT OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEY SETTLEMENT, K R CIRCLE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …ACCUSED 4. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. ...PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2, SRI B.B. SAGAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3, SRI S.H. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA FOR R4) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 FOR WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 28.08.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.13755/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7749-DB CCC No. 910 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. C. Karthik for the complainant fairly stated that since the endorsement/order is issued by the respondents, the directions of learned Single Judge are complied with and the contempt proceedings does not survive. 2. In that view, the contempt petition is liable to be disposed of as not surviving. 3. It was requested to the Court by learned advocate for the complainant that the complainant may be granted liberty to challenge the said endorsement/order. 4. It is observed that such liberty is reserved. The complainant may institute appropriate independent proceedings, if so advised, to - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:7749-DB CCC No. 910 of 2024 challenge the said endorsement/order on merits in respect of which, however, this court does not express any opinion on merits. 5. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47