CHANDBA GANGARAM PUYAD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDED AND ORS
CA/13817/2024 · 2025-02-18
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32186 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32186 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} 43 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13817 OF 2024 IN FAST/31791/2024 Chandba Gangaram Puyad ….Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra, Through District Collector, Nanded And Ors …..Respondent ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rakhunde Pravin B. AGP for Respondents: Mr. D.B. Bhange. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Ingole R.K.
CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 18TH FEBRUARY, 2025.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned advocate for appellant and learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Applicant seeks to condone delay of 232 days caused in filing the appeal. Perused the reasons in para. 2 to 5 of the application. Apparently, applicant is litigating for getting just compensation towards the acquired land. Financial difficulty prevented him from approaching this court within period of limitation. In that view of the matter, sufficient cause is made out. In the result, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). Appeal be registered on removal of office objections.
[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J]
grt/-