G. P. SAXENA S/O LATE SHRI T.S. SAXENA v. SHRI NATHMAL DEEDEL
CCP/1101/2023 · 2025-08-28
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32183 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32183 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1101/2023 G. P. Saxena S/o Late Shri T.s. Saxena, Aged About 72 Years, R/o 3/379, Chitrakoot, Gandhipath, Vaishali, Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Nathmal Deedel, Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road, Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Shreya Guha, Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3. Shubhra Singh, Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Purushottam Sharma, Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ghiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 28/08/2025
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 14.07.2023, passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5440/2016.
2. Vide order dated 14.07.2023, the Court disposed the writ petition with the directions to the respondents to pass a fresh
order in light of the circular dated 06.04.2013 and grant the benefit of revised pension to the petitioner accordingly.
[2025:RJ-JP:34472] (2 of 2) [CCP-1101/2023]
3. Respondents have filed the compliance report as well as an additional affidavit.
4. As per the averments made in the additional affidavit, the respondents have passed the order dated 18.07.2025 in light of the circular dated 06.04.2013 and have further ordered for revised pension w.e.f. 01.01.2006.
5. In view of the fact that the respondents have passed the
order dated 18.07.2025 in light of the circular dated 06.04.2013, in opinion of the Court, the respondents have complied with the
order and thus contempt proceeding no more survives and the same is disposed.
6. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him under law to challenge the
order dated 18.07.2025, if he has any grievance in that regard.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /Satyendra/70